The Vital Connection Between Strategic Planning and a Board’s Fiduciary Responsibilities

The Nonprofit Strategy Group’s Board Leadership Accelerator training wrapped up last week. The passion, commitment, and dedication shown by this year’s cohort were exemplary. TNSG provides this training for board members who want to improve their understanding of their role and that of the board as a whole.

The Accelerator is grounded in the three duties of board governance: the duties of care, obedience, and loyalty. Participating in this training is a solid example of the duty of care in action - deepening the understanding of the board of directors. This duty requires board members to act thoughtfully, responsibly, and in the best interests of the organization in all their decision-making.

Participation in strategic planning is another example of fulfilling this duty. The Board holds ultimate authority for setting an organization’s strategic direction, thereby ensuring that resources are being used optimally in pursuit of the mission.  But this does not mean that the board should go it alone. Far from it. 

To set the strategic direction, it is imperative that board members understand the community needs that the organization is trying to address. This cannot be done in isolation. To do so would be contrary to the duty of care. 

What sources of information can a board draw on to help determine the organization’s strategic direction? Here are some suggestions:

  • Staff Insights: Staff members bring invaluable, on-the-ground perspectives as they implement programs and engage directly with beneficiaries. Their expertise and daily experiences provide critical insights that shape realistic, effective strategic decisions. This is why including staff and board members as equal partners in strategic planning processes is essential.

  • Community Feedback: Input from community partners, program participants, and volunteers introduces multiple perspectives into the decision-making process. This feedback,often from individuals who understand community needs deeply or in ways board members may not, enriches and grounds strategic planning.

  • Evaluation Data: Past performance data allows the board to see what has worked, what hasn't, and where improvement is needed. This data-driven approach enables evidence-based decision-making, ensuring the board can build on successes and course-correct when necessary.

  • Research and External Resources: Staying informed about external factors, such as research on health disparities, housing challenges, or other social issues the organization addresses, provides essential context. This understanding helps the board align the organization’s mission with current needs, trends, and best practices.


By integrating insights from these sources, a board can fulfill its duty of care, leading the organization in a direction that optimizes resources and strengthens mission impact.

While strategic planning is indeed time-intensive, a well-facilitated, inclusive process reaps long-term benefits. Bringing in external facilitators, like The Nonprofit Strategy Group, can help ensure a balanced process that mitigates internal biases, equitably includes all perspectives, and eases the planning burden for both the board and staff. 

The three duties of care are foundational to board performance. The three examples in this blog of the duty of care in action: taking time to learn the role of the board; engaging in a robust approach to strategic planning; and learning from the perspectives of people outside the board, demonstrate how adherence to this duty can be operationalized. And then there are the duties of loyalty and obedience, the board’s role as ambassadors, and the board’s responsibilities as the employer of the CEO/Executive Director.

Ongoing professional education is critical to board performance. It also helps board members to realize their ultimate reason for joining a board: because the mission of their chosen organization resonates with them deeply, and they want to help move that mission forward.

Next
Next

Women, Leadership, and Equity